Unfortunately, this only applies to American readers. Gee, are they ever loving fast food? Tacos, wraps, chicken sandwiches to breads. Grain products are good, but when you head to fast food chains, they are mostly wheat types, which I personally think they are more of an allergen than good. White bread is not good either, but since I prefer rye type, not all places serve rye. Deli meats are mostly not my favorite because they are pork types. Bagels with shmears, hummus, and peanut butter are good for a lunch.
Stay tuned when I do have a chance to sought out healthiest place to eat elsewhere.
My reasons not to watch the Oscars, but only to watch Internet clips:
1. Its over 3.5 hours long.
2. Way too many commercials.
3. Chatters?
4. I do not want to know what the men suits look like.
5. Please is humor that funny without Tina Fey? If she shows up, perhaps I might be able to see her online the next day, thats technology for you.
6. As much as I like the tributes, I don't like the length anymore as the next person.
7. Why the technical jargons while we can watch the clips online or order them by snail?
8. This year, glad it aren't laughs, therefore its safe.
9. Do I have to see the fake Oscars statute, while I prefer the real replica?
10. Oh dear, it is Angelia Jolie again!
Play us a song you simply HAVE to sing along with whenever you hear it? (Go ahead and sing too, because you're good!)
Submitted by Jan.
I am not sure what is the exact message of that is at this trying times. The only fact that the Canadian Revenue Agency are launching the contest in quiet without the fanfare and the media glare would indicate that the underground economy would not be such a high priority problem? Would this also have some political undertones?